The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands at times of comfort and convenience but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
We see nature as a resource. It is. It is also a living organism just like our bodies. We too are a resource. Whatever we catalogue as resource will demonstrate where we ourselves are also resource. We label things as addictions when they are merely actions designed to effect a balance. Like a storm or a fire or a flood.
If addiction to comfort and convenience were real then why do we also have challenge and dis ease? The theory is flawed. When we label it is like cutting off your middle finger and examining it and making up a story about why and what without seeing where it fits onto a whole body and it is in that body that it has a purpose.
A label of cancer or diabetes doesn’t consider the whole organism and the purpose of those symptoms of dis ease in ALL the systems.
It would be hard to find an enterprise, service or product that doesn’t feed our addiction to comfort and convenience. Is it actually an addiction?
Isn’t it actually a natural state?